Maquet Critical Care AB recalls GETINGE Y SENSOR Module
The module did not undergo electrical safety tests and functional tests during production.
- Facility Use Continuous Ventilator
- Under Investigation by firm
The FDA has posted 11 enforcement recalls of facility use continuous ventilator devices since 2025, including 9 Class I (most serious) recalls. Most recent report: Aug 26, 2026.
The module did not undergo electrical safety tests and functional tests during production.
Due to a Supercapacitor electrolyte leakage on Printed Circuit Board Assembly (PCBA) may damage the charger chip, causing fail-safe state and interruption of ventilation therapy.
Respiratory system intended to provide continuous/intermittent ventilator support, may have a damaged back-up battery supporting backup alarm function, which may result in the backup alarm not activating during loss of p…
In some situations, the Obstruction Alarm does not trigger within the timeframe dictated by the relevant standards and may take up to four breaths.
In some situations, the Obstruction Alarm does not trigger within the timeframe dictated by the relevant standards and may take up to four breaths.
In some situations, the Obstruction Alarm does not trigger within the timeframe dictated by the relevant standards and may take up to four breaths.
In some situations, the Obstruction Alarm does not trigger within the timeframe dictated by the relevant standards and may take up to four breaths.
Using non-pneumatic nebulizers with Trilogy Evo Platform ventilators may result in a discrepancy between the set tidal volume and the tidal volume received by the patient.
Using non-pneumatic nebulizers with Trilogy Evo Platform ventilators may result in a discrepancy between the set tidal volume and the tidal volume received by the patient.
Using non-pneumatic nebulizers with Trilogy Evo Platform ventilators may result in a discrepancy between the set tidal volume and the tidal volume received by the patient.
Using non-pneumatic nebulizers with Trilogy Evo Platform ventilators may result in a discrepancy between the set tidal volume and the tidal volume received by the patient.
Source: U.S. FDA openFDA device enforcement reports, updated continuously. Device type per the FDA's RES classification (“Ventilator, Continuous, Facility Use”). Informational only — verify against the FDA before acting.